Project Management Foundations to turn pages · drag a corner
Course Preview

Project
Management
Foundations

Five sessions · 35 structured hours
Built on the PMBOK® Guide, Eighth Edition
Why This Course

Built to teach judgment, not recall.

An awareness-level foundation aligned to the PMI Talent Triangle®. Every session returns to the learner’s own projects through a new lens.

35
Structured hours
5
Sessions
7
Performance domains
2025
PMBOK® 8 edition
The Course, End to End

One thread, five ways.

1
What Is Project Management & Why It Matters
Project vs. operation; the value a sponsor recognizes.
2
Focus Areas, Performance Domains & Tailoring
Two axes: how work unfolds, and what runs in parallel.
3
Project Artifacts
Which artifacts a project needs, and when each earns its place.
4
Building the Plan: Schedule, Budget & Team
Scope becomes a schedule, a budget, and a team.
5
Putting It All Together
The capstone — a plan you can defend.
Section One

Inside the
Session Decks

Five self-contained decks — keyboard-driven, animated, built to present. Two live slides follow.

Session 1 · Live Deck
Session 1 slide 4
Slide 4 — “A Shared Professional Foundation”
Session 2 · Live Deck
Session 2 focus areas slide
“The Five Focus Areas at a Glance”
In-class exercise · 45 min

Map a Project

Read one unbranded municipal scenario, then analyze it. The work is interpretation, not recall.

01
Read the scenario
One unbranded municipal capital project.
02
Map the Focus Areas
What work is happening, and where in the lifecycle?
03
Identify active Domains
Which domains most demand attention, and when?
04
Locate the complexity
Where do risk, friction, and surprise actually live?
Map a Project · Sample Answer Key

Domain intensity across the lifecycle

One defensible reading — how hard each domain works, phase by phase.

InitPlanExecM&CClose
GovernanceHighMedMedMedMed
ScopeMedHighMedHighHigh
ScheduleLowHighHighHighLow
FinanceMedHighMedHighMed
StakeholdersHighMedMedMedHigh
ResourcesLowHighHighMedLow
RiskHighHighMedHighLow
LowMedHigh
Facilitator: the debrief compares readings. There is a defensible answer, not one correct one.
Section Two

From the
Participant Guide

Fully typeset, session by session. Four pages from Session 2 follow — as delivered.

Participant Guide · Cover
participant guide page
Participant Guide · Part Opener
participant guide page
Participant Guide · Focus Areas
participant guide page
Participant Guide · Focus Area 01
participant guide page
In-class exercise · 25 min

Charter Content — Pick the Best

Weigh three options for each of five charter sections; choose what belongs on a one-page charter.

Business CaseObjectivesSuccess CriteriaScopeRisks
Worked — Business Case
ABoilerplate
“Enhance our parks for better recreation and to show our commitment to public spaces.”
Generic — could describe any park, any city.
BStrong charter fit
~85,000 visits a year; a 1978 playground that no longer meets ADA; a time-bound state grant. Close the gap, capture the funds, refresh the asset.
Names the need, the deadline, the cost of waiting.
CWrong altitude
“Demolish the 2,400 sq ft playground to ASTM F1487-21; regrade paths; repour 4,200 ft of walkway…”
Execution detail — belongs in the plan.
Charter · Why It Works

The distractors are not random.

Each wrong option models a failure pattern found in real charters. Naming the pattern is half the exercise.

BoilerplateWrong altitudeSentimentalAuthor-centricActivity-basedNo boundariesGeneric riskIssues-as-risks
Facilitator probe: “Which single phrase in the winning option would a Council member remember?”
Let’s Get Started

Let’s customize the course and get your team trained.

Sends your details straight to IDCI — we’ll reply to your email.